Can I Go To Sweden With A Dutch Schengen

Bank identity, some supplements

Following

my tickets on the concept of bank identity as an extension of OpenID, here are some thoughts in bulk.

First, the difficulty of
develop such a protocol. I do not say it's within reach of a child of CP, but it is not insurmountable. This requires a modeling phase of trade, keeping in mind the continuing safety, but also the optimization of the connections between servers.

 
 Then there is the question of 
 adoption 
 by Internet and social networks. What is certain is that until someone does, no site will adopt it. Today, I do not know how many accounts exist OpenId (I even think that it's hard to know), but the successive announcements of the last days can only improve its adoption. For a newcomer it may greatly facilitate the creation of a social network, focusing on its specificity, where there will be value added. For existing networks, the decentralized aspect allows them to open without 
 "lose" 
 their profiles. And 
 
 in the world of business, 
 one can imagine 
 prospects database 

a new employee can easily add, simply by sharing these relations since the bank identity.

 For the visitor, we move another notch in the dimension "I am master of my information." 
 
 course, this concerns every individual, but also the organizations (I can put in my relationship I am manager of Kappa) 
 
 The key word in all this is security. It's not for nothing that I say 
 bank 
 identity. It must provide maximum security, which is not opposed to a lot of freedom in use (make public profile example) 
 
 business model? There is none. Not on the protocol. But one can imagine on the services offered by the bank 

identity.
This probably will remain a dream, at least for some time. But I think it will happen one day or another to such services as the need exists today.
I do not have time to develop. Not alone. But I confess that if others are interested in a project like this, I think I let myself be tempted.
the wise ...

Cheap And Cute Nose Rings

Bank identity, an example to better understand

In case some missed
early
is the result of a post that explains how to extend the OpenID standard.

So I have promised an example. My name

ME, and I know three people
A ,
B and C
. My OpenID is http://moi.myopenid.com I wish to register on the social network RS.com
First step: I sign on RS.com

I therefore give my OpenID identifier, I am redirected to my bank asking me identity first of all identify with, then informs me that the service requested
RS.com
personal information (name, age). I finally decided to accept
RS.com as a trusted site and I will convey the information requested. I am then redirected to the site RS.com

Until then, I've done that describe the current functioning of OpenID.



Second step: I would like to invite knowledge on this network.

I click on

invite knowledge, and I am redirected to my bank identity. It retrieves the portion of ID
Site
RS.com
(with between Another message of invitation by default).
I'm on my account and I want those who I know that I want to invite. I can supplement the default message by a small custom word. A message (XML) is then sent to the bank identity of my contact (B for example), including the identity card RS.com (or just the URL where find), my username and my invitation message. If this person knows me, if I am part of his relationships (where one accepts the declarative relations
, type Ziki or FOAF), the bank identity passes this message to my contact , through which he defined (mail, instant messaging, RSS feeds ...).
All this may be asynchronous, of course.

Meanwhile, once I've finished inviting my knowledge, I am redirected to RS.com

It is also conceivable that go directly to my account OpenID to invite people and in this case it is necessary to obtain the identity card Site RS.com simply (indeed it would be quite logical that it is public). Step Three: B has accepted my invitation. This means he registered on the site by telling
RS.com he came after my invitation. Again, it is the bank of identity that reconciles: when B is part of the site, meaning it accepts RS.com
as a trusted site, the bank seeks identity the list of invitations received those relating
RS.com
and reported to the site (after approval of B, of course).
site
RS.com is informed of the relationship between B and I and stores it in cache (for performance issues and research in the graphs). As for me, I am informed that B has accepted my invitation.

Step Four: I made new contacts through RS.com If these contacts are themselves an OpenID identity, RS.com inform my bank identity of this new relationship which can then to save space in my OpenId. End of example.


The principle of decentralized storage of which is that OpenID currently allows the existing social networks not to de-enter their information but to provide a new service for their users go on other sites without having to retype everything. should even able to "compel
" sites to communicate on request all information about a user. Let me explain. If the site
RS.com
internally manages a number of additional information about me (profile, statistics, I do not know what), I'm able to retrieve this info in one click (XML) in my OpenID account.
An important point (I do not know what is the policy of OpenID today) when I change personal information (my phone number for example) my bank identity must "push" this information to all services that use an upgrade Full Update.

I hope I was clear about ...

Where Can I Watch Sean Cody For Free Yahoo

An extension to OpenId?

While ads in favor of OpenID are increasingly numerous (after Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL, Digg is the team that announced the support by the end of Year of the OpenID standard), I offer you a ticket long enough to imagine what could be the result of OpenID.
Edit: considering the size, I prefer to do two tickets together under the tag bank identity.

What that

OpenID today? In summary, is: I a unique identifier (a URL) I centralizes and manages data about me

I give (or not) access to certain data services that require authentication (password verification) is delegated to OpenId

Then of course there are some questions that arise: in terms of security, what about identity theft? Is there a type of encryption public key / private key? Or to be more clear: if I agreed to share some of my info service Doe, am I sure that nobody can impersonate Doe

and retrieve this data?
If people have information about it, I'm interested. Otherwise, I will seek. Anyway, here is a summary of OpenID today. But now, to go a little farther, and because my relationships are just part of my identity, I think it would centralize power in the same way my relationships with others (who themselves OpenID URL ), describe these relationships (predefined types and tags free), and provide access to these relations to different services. This is certainly the dream of all bulimic social networks, but we will try to better see how this can be possible. A key issue by cons is what we consider

relationship. Is
unilateral
like Ziki

and with the FOAF standard

(I declare that I know this person), or is it that this relationship is reciprocal , ie the other recognize the person as well? For now, I have not decided the issue.

But nothing is clear that an example, I suggest you follow me in what could be the service identity bank ...